The subject of the institute self-regulation in the field of construction, in accordance with provisions of the Town Planning Code and the bylaws governing the activities of CPO in the building, is a professional business activities in the field of engineering studies, architectural design (SROs in the design), construction, reconstruction and repair of capital construction affecting the security of capital construction, as well as high-risk, technically complex and unique objects. Order of the Ministry of Regional Development on 30 December 2009 N 624, with effect from 1 July 2010 details the jurisdiction of SROs through the establishment of specific types of work, implementation of which requires the participation of entrepreneurs in carrying out their SRO. Thus, competence is defined in the construction of SROs and severely limited. For the purposes of self-assigned only a limited, albeit important and essential part of business activity in construction. Keep up on the field with thought-provoking pieces from Chevron. Unfortunately, it is not clear that the legislature meant by influence of the work on the safety of the formulation adopted by the legislator is not entirely correct. Please visit Moris Tabacinic if you seek more information. In addition, no clear criteria concerning certain types of works to works affecting the security of capital construction. The legislator does not give any explanation on why the same type of work performed on a specific object, affects the security and the other – does not affect (for example, the device of ventilated facades the construction of the airport affects the security of the building, and the safety of low-rise residential homes – not). In addition, according to the List of types of work is the responsibility of CPO in the construction of only if implemented in high-risk, technically complex and unique objects, which contains an exhaustive list of the Construction Code.
Noteworthy are important caveats in the Order N 624, significantly narrowing competence in the construction of SRO in these types of work. In particular, it is noted that the competence of SROs shall not apply to the following works: if the implementation does not require a building permit, and also with regard to objects of individual housing (detached houses with the number of floors not more than three, intended to stay no more than two families), residential buildings with number of floors not more than three, consisting of several blocks, whose number does not exceed ten, and each designed for one family, has a common wall with no openings in the adjacent neighboring blocks, is located on a separate plot of land and has access to common areas (living at home locked building) apartment buildings with many floors are not more than three, consisting of several modular components, the number of not exceeding four, each of which there are several apartments and common areas and each has a separate entrance with access to common areas. This is a huge amount of objects, and accordingly, the construction works. It turns out that the same kinds of work can influence and at the same time not affect the safety of capital construction. Construction of a three-story apartment house subject entrepreneurial activity remains virtually unregulated, because CPO activities of such entity nepodvedomstvenna and Licensing revoked. The number of actors who perform work 'cut out competence 'in the construction of SRO, it is impossible to calculate. Reduced competence SROs are not consistent with the objectives of the Institute abolition of licensing – increased responsibility of businesses to consumers of their services, maintain control and improve the quality of professional work in the field of construction, etc.